Recent Posts

1.    Neo-Pagan  (100%)
2.    Unitarian Universalism (98%)
3.    Liberal Quakers (94%)
4.    New Age (91%)
5.    Reform Judaism (81%)
6.    Mainline to Liberal Christian Protestants (77%)
7.    Mahayana Buddhism (72%)
8.    New Thought (67%)
9.    Jainism (65%)
10.    Secular Humanism (65%)
11.    Sikhism (63%)
12.    Theravada Buddhism (62%)
13.    Baha'i Faith (62%)
14.    Scientology (57%)
15.    Orthodox Judaism (53%)
16.    Hinduism (53%)
17.    Orthodox Quaker (50%)
18.    Taoism (47%)
19.    Islam (46%)
20.    Nontheist (43%)
21.    Christian Science (Church of Christ, Scientist) (37%)
22.    Mainline to Conservative Christian/Protestant (27%)
23.    Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-Day Saints (Mormons) (26%)
24.    Seventh Day Adventist (24%)
25.    Eastern Orthodox (20%)
26.    Roman Catholic (20%)
27.    Jehovah's Witness (17%)

If you need me I'll be casting a spell or two

...Ice and Fire...

Hail and well-met, brother.   

Whatever comes in the future, I am prepared. I welcome the challenges in my life, for I am sure I will succeed and my genes will progress through whatever hard times I may encounter. I am a caveman, to the civilized world, I say "Bring it on."

http://paleoeater.blogspot.com/

Excellent... thank you.

 

This link is a man's blog about his year with the Paleo diet. He doesn't really go into detail about what he eats, but its fun to go through and follow his progress.

http://paleoeater.blogspot.com/

... oh and by the way, it should say: "Eat your damned oatmeal." 

This guy advertises here in the states, for Quaker Oatmeal, and he's the spokesman for Liberty Medical where he talks at length about his "diabeetus" medicine. Oatmeal rots your brain, too.

Also the CAVEMANFORUM has a place in the forum where we can post progress reports, having that here might be a benefit to your website and give you testimonials.

Overall I am very impressed with your website. I've had problems with sticking with a paleolithic diet, your three stage proposal might help me overcome the inertia.

Okay enough of the roses, I also have some thorns.

I may seem like a Grammar Nazi, but it takes away from the legitimacy of the site, I feel. On the stage three page, in the first paragraph, you write: "You would of lost excess weight, optimised your energy levels, and sharpened your mind."  The first part should read: 'You would have lost excess weight...'.

I am making this last suggestion in complete ignorance of Australian and International law on this matter. All I know is Americans are more litigious than other countries and if this were an American website, you would be at risk, so at least look into it. For your protection, I think you should have some statement that says to the effect of "this is not intended to cure disease (I know it will) talk to your doctor if you have a chronic medical condition". That's what all the websites say, we don't want anyone going into a diabetic coma and coming after you.