I was tempted to ask what particular event or person offended someones sensibility when talking about things done wrongly in the name of religion. It is necessary to quantify the specific offense in order to compare it to other wrongs.
Hitler, Stalin, Mao, and Pol Pot are men guided by a different philosophical ideas in contrast to Christianity. Yet, the number of people killed under their regimes dwarfs anything I am aware of in terms of lost life under so called religious killings. Anybody disagree?
From what I see, people take offense to the ideals of those men.
I believe religion is an ideal... People are killed over said ideals/religions... by definition they are different yet also very similar.. Only difference between the two is that one involves a supernatural being and the other does not. Yet the concept is the same. You can have faith in your ideals just as you can have faith in your religion... so perhaps the whole argument is being misguided by the wrong word?
People will be killed over just about anything... A man was killed outside of my apartment complex over $16, a Man killed his entire family in fear that they would live in a dud economy, the colonists used smallpox to kill off the native americans in order to take their lands, The Ceasars killed countless people over the conquest of land too... as long as there are things to control people will always kill eachother in an attempt to gain control.. Killing over ideals is just one small piece of the bigger puzzle...
I am positive that this conversation has become a battle over ideals rather than a debate about valid information concerning evolution and creationsim...